Chapelle (2004) explores the role, use, and interpretation
of technologically-based second language acquisition research. One of the
problems noted by Chapelle is the difficulty posed by capturing and understanding
computer-mediated interaction. As cited by Chapelle, there is a general tendency
to analyze that and only that which appears on the computer screen. Despite the
fact that much of this 'off-screen' behavior on the part of the L2 user is not
perceived by the other participant, this behavior still provides details on the
nature of computer-mediated interaction. This growing awareness of the need to
capture the full range of interaction, both vocalized and non-vocalized,
parallels that which is found within the field of linguistics. It is more and
more apparent that the gestures, gazes, and other 'supralinguistic' behavior
made by native speakers is an important part of their discourse competence and
therefore needs to be documented and described. For example, when speakers use
demonstratives, the gestures that are made, whether they be with the hands,
lips, eyes, eyebrows, chin, or other body parts, differ between cultures and
languages. In order to capture this information, documentation by means of
audio and video is becoming increasingly more frequent. The collection of this
type of interactional data, whether it be for native speakers, second language
speakers, or both groups, informs both the teaching and the acquisition of
these features of discourse competency.
Hi Megan,
ReplyDeleteI also find Chapelle's article very insightful. With today's technology, collecting interactional data of participants in front of computer screen becomes feasible. These data can be useful for analyzing leaner's cognitive and psychological activities, and students' learning strategies. Inferences generated on the basis of interactional the data will inform further research and language instructional practice.